Feasibility and acceptability of establishing virtual exercise classes for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients

Background: CFTR modulators have led to improvements in CF outcomes, including FEV1, exacerbation frequency and body mass index (BMI). Despite positive outcomes, modulators have brought new challenges – particularly elevated BMI. For many, weight gain has been due to increased fat rather than muscle mass, making exercise a high priority. Exercise has always been an integral part of CF management. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it harder for patients to access exercise. This presented a service need to set up a platform where patients could safely exercise at home with support from a known physiotherapist. Objectives: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a physiotherapyled online group exercise class for CF patients. Methods: In this pilot study, high and low intensity virtual exercise classes were delivered twice weekly over four weeks. Eight participants were recruited;five completed the study. The primary outcomes were (1) feasibility, assessed by means, resources and time needed to deliver the intervention and (2) acceptability, assessed by qualitative interviews with participants. FEV1, BMI, 60STS and psychosocial outcomes were also monitored. Results: Time, resources and equipment were all adequate to deliver the intervention within the service. Positive themes from interviews included: (1) Impact on health: improved fitness, (2) Motivation to exercise: feeling encouraged, supported and accountable, and (3) Convenience: saved time, money and ease of exercising at home. Some challenges patients reported were space, technical issues with equipment and missing face-to-face interaction. Conclusion: Virtual exercise classes for patients with CF are both feasible and acceptable, with patients reporting a positive impact on their fitness levels as well as reduced travel burden. Patients also stated that classes delivered by a familiar physiotherapist motivated them to exercise and instilled confidence that the exercises were safe and effective.Background: CFTR modulators have led to improvements in CF outcomes, including FEV1, exacerbation frequency and body mass index (BMI). Despite positive outcomes, modulators have brought new challenges – particularly elevated BMI. For many, weight gain has been due to increased fat rather than muscle mass, making exercise a high priority. Exercise has always been an integral part of CF management. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has made it harder for patients to access exercise. This presented a service need to set up a platform where patients could safely exercise at home with support from a known physiotherapist. Objectives: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a physiotherapyled online group exercise class for CF patients. Methods: In this pilot study, high and low intensity virtual exercise classes were delivered twice weekly over four weeks. Eight participants were recruited;five completed the study. The primary outcomes were (1) feasibility, assessed by means, resources and time needed to deliver the intervention and (2) acceptability, assessed by qualitative interviews with participants. FEV1, BMI, 60STS and psychosocial outcomes were also monitored. Results: Time, resources and equipment were all adequate to deliver the intervention within the service. Positive themes from interviews included: (1) Impact on health: improved fitness, (2) Motivation to exercise: feeling encouraged, supported and accountable, and (3) Convenience: saved time, money and ease of exercising at home. Some challenges patients reported were space, technical issues with equipment and missing face-to-face interaction. Conclusion: Virtual exercise classes for patients with CF are both feasible and acceptable, with patients reporting a positive impact on their fitness levels as well as reduced travel burden. Patients also stated that classes delivered by a familiar physiotherapist motivated them to exercise and instilled confidence that the exercises were safe and effective.

Medicines considered for COVID-19 treatment during the pandemic period in Brazil: a review

Covid-19 is caused by SARS-CoV-2, which is responsible for the pandemics state declared in March 2020, leading to more than 500 thousand deaths in Brazil until June 2021. It is believed the severe cases are related to cytokines storm and to ACE2 receptor gene expression increasement. The present study aims to bring a review on the current types of medicines used for Covid-19 treatment in Brazil, highlighting the importance of deeper therapeutical studies for the disease. The qualitative bibliographical review was performed between June 2020 and June 2021, based on 32 articles about the topic and found on the PUBMED, MEDLINE, Scielo e Google Scholar databases. Scientific research and studies enabled the vaccines development as a prophylactic tool against Covid-19. However, the medicines used for treatment are still unclear. One of the first drugs for new coronavirus treatment cited in the literature was the chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Moreover, azithromycin (AZI), nitazoxanide (NTZ) e methylprednisolone (MPDN) are also consideredas therapeutic alternatives in Brazil. In the case of already infected individuals, the vaccine is not efficient for treatment anymore. Thus, it is necessary to identify an efficient treatment against Covid-19, being necessary deeper research about the medicines to combat SARS-CoV-2.

The relationship between symptoms and functional physiological outcomes in survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia

P136 Table 1Results of correlation analysis Correlation analysis 4MGS 1STSreps SpO2% desaturation Results r p-value r p-value r p-value Pre-COVID mMRC dyspnoea score 0(0–1) -0.267** <0.001 -0.285** <0.001 -0.108 0.094 Post-COVID mMRC dyspnoea score 1(0–2) -0.442** <0.001 -0.457** <0.001 -0.143* 0.025 NRS breathlessness 3(0–5) -0.287** <0.001 -0.406** <0.001 -0.490 0.445 NRS fatigue 3(0–5) -0.315** <0.001 -0.379** <0.001 -0.190* 0.003 NRS cough 0(0–2) -0.660 0.292 -0.153* 0.017 0.083 0.194 NRS pain 1(0–4) -0.278** <0.001 -0.346** <0.001 -0.188* 0.003 NRS sleep difficulty 2(0–5) -0.246** <0.001 -0.386** <0.001 -0.122 0.057 Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or frequency (proportion%;95% confidence interval). SpO2% desaturation = SpO2% desaturation from baseline during 1 minute sit to stand test;1STSreps = repetitions per minute during 1 minute sit to stand test;4MGS = 4 metre gait speed;mMRC = modified Medical Research Council;NRS = 0 – 10 numerical rating scale;r = Spearman correlation coefficient. *indicates statistical significance at 0.05 level. **indicates statistical significance at 0.001 level.ConclusionRespiratory symptoms were not strong predictors of 4-metre gait speed and 1-minute sit-to-stand test performance. These data highlight the importance of face-to-face testing to objectively assess functional limitation in patients recovering from severe COVID pneumonia.

Clinical, functional and psychological characteristics of survivors of severe COVID-19 pneumonia: a comparison of outcomes from the first and second waves

P135 Table 1Patient demographics, self-reported scores and functional test results by wave 1st wave 2nd wave p-value Demographics n=167 n=141 Age 59±13 58±12 0.564 Female 60 (35.93;28.94–43.40) 62 (43.97;35.97–52.22) 0.15 BMI (kg/m2) 30.5 (26.6–35.2) 32.1 (28.5–37.9) 0.009 ** BAME 115 (69.7;62.39–76.32) 72 (59.5;50.62–67.94) 0.073 Number of comorbidities 2 (1–3) 2 (1–3) 0.144 Patients Receiving Drugs Dexamethasone 11 (6.63;3.57–11.17) 138 (97.87;94.43–99.40) <0.001 *** Remdesivir 18 (10.84;6.79–16.24) 81 (57.45;49.20–65.39) <0.001 *** Other Immunomodulator 2 (1.20;0.25–3.81) 31 (21.99;15.76–29.35) <0.001 *** Questionnaire Scores n=164 n=132 NRS Breathlessness 2 (0–5) 3 (0–5) 0.153 ≥4 56 (34.78;27.75–42.36) 52 (37.14;29.47–45.34) 0.67 NRS Cough 0 (0–2) 0 (0–3) 0.439 ≥4 17 (10.56;6.52–16.00) 18 (13.64;8.59–20.26) 0.419 NRS Fatigue 3 (0–5) 3 (0–5) 0.867 ≥4 65 (40.63;33.24–48.35) 48 (36.92;28.99–45.43) 0.52 NRS Pain 0 (0–5) 1 (0–3) 0.682 ≥4 44 (27.50;21.03–34.78) 30 (23.08;16.48–30.86) 0.39 NRS Sleep disturbance 2 (0–5) 2 (0–5) 0.558 ≥4 52 (32.50;25.61–40.02) 49 (37.40;29.47–45.89) 0.382 Pre-COVID-19 mMRC 1 (0–2) 1 (1–2) 0.478 Post-COVID-19 mMRC 0 (0–1) 0 (0–1) 0.329 Post-COVID-19 mMRC ≥2 66 (40.99;33.61–48.70) 49 (38.58;30.45–47.23) 0.678 PCFS 2 (0–3) 1 (0–2) 0.055 PCFS ≥2 80 (50.00;42.31–57.69) 51 (42.15;33.62–51.05) 0.191 PHQ-9 ≥10 32 (20.38;14.66–27.19) 29 (23.02;16.33–30.92) 0.592 GAD-7 ≥10 34 (21.38;15.56–28.24) 16 (12.80;7.81- 19.49) 0.059 TSQ ≥6 43 (27.56;21.01–34.94) 27 (22.31;15.60–30.33) 0.319 Functional Tests n=160 n=139 4MGS <0.8 (ms-1) 67 (42.41;34.89–50.19) 47 (35.07;27.38–43.40) 0.201 1STS repetitions 18 (12–23) 17 (12–21) 0.460 <2.5 percentile 96 (60.00;52.29–67.36) 108 (77.70;70.25–84.00) 0.011 * Desaturation ≥4% 52 (34.67;27.40–4 .52) 42 (32.31;24.73–40.67) 0.677 Parametric data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, non-parametric data are presented as median (interquartile range) or frequency (proportion;95% confidence interval). Statistical significance indicated by * (p<0.05), ** (p<0.01), *** (p<0.001). BMI = Body mass index, BAME = Black, Asian or minority ethnic, NRS = Numerical rating scale (0–10), mMRC = modified Medical Research Council for dyspnoea (0–4), PCFS = Post-COVID-19 functional status scale (0–4), PHQ-9 = Patient health questionnaire 9 (0–27), GAD-7 = General Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (0–21), TSQ = Trauma screening questionnaire (0–10), 4MGS = 4-metre gait speed, 1STS = 1-minute sit-to-stand.ConclusionDespite shorter admission duration, and less frequent IMV, the burden of symptoms and functional limitation experienced post-hospitalisation for severe COVID-19 pneumonia was at least as severe during Wave 2 as in Wave 1. Identification of contributing factors and impact on post-COVID rehabilitation outcomes requires further study.

Acute Pulmonary Histoplasmosis Following COVID-19: Novel Laboratorial Methods Aiding Diagnosis

The acute form of histoplasmosis usually occurs after the exposition of more than one individual to a common environmental source harboring Histoplasma capsulatum. Here, we present two cases of acute pulmonary histoplasmosis seen within two weeks at a reference center for infectious diseases at Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The patients did not present a common epidemiologic history for histoplasmosis, however both presented COVID-19 before the onset of histoplasmosis symptoms. Due to the difficulties in the diagnosis of acute histoplasmosis, novel laboratory methods such as Western Blot and PCR were included in the investigation of these cases. Both patients presented negative cultures for H. capsulatum and negative urinary galactomannan. However, they presented H and M bands in the Western blot as well as a positive H. capsulatum DNA detection in sputum. These results were available approximately 36 h after sample collection, fastening the beginning of treatment of one patient. Both patients progressed well with itraconazole treatment. These cases suggest that COVID-19 may facilitate the development of acute pulmonary histoplasmosis and, therefore, clinicians must be aware of this differential diagnosis in patients from endemic areas with fever and coughing after recovery from COVID-19.

Remote delivery of care to people with cystic Fibrosis during covid-19 shielding is not Detrimental to patient outcomes

Introduction and Objectives Intensive surveillance of lung function (FEV1), body weight and airway microbiology is central to good cystic fibrosis (CF) care. National standards recommend people with CF (pwCF) are reviewed at least three monthly by specialist multidisciplinary teams. COVID-19 'shielding' precautions, set to protect clinically extremely vulnerable people, terminated all but essential face-to-face clinical contact for over four months. Many pwCF remain apprehensive as restrictions ease. The King's Adult CF Unit delivers care to 250 pwCF across south-east England. We discuss the immediate service changes in response to COVID-19, and the effect on patient outcomes of limited clinician review. Methods At the start of shielding the entire patient cohort was reviewed and grouped as stable or of concern. Telephone and/or video clinics were implemented, and patients identified as high risk were prioritised for remote self-monitoring (FEV1 with Bluetooth home spirometers, weight, postal sputum samples). Home visits or ward reviews, by specialist nurses or physiotherapists, were arranged if clinically essential. We undertook a cohort review of consecutive patients emerging from shielding to compare clinical parameters before and after lockdown. Results Since shielding ended, 24 consecutive patients (see table 1) have been reviewed, at a median (IQR) of 167 (155, 180) days after pre-COVID assessments. At review, 2 patients had a clinically significant fall in lung function (10%), however no statistical difference in FEV1, weight or BMI (n=21) was seen overall following shielding when compared to measurements immediately (29 (21, 46) days) before lockdown (ppFEV10.0 (-0.1, 0.1), BMI 0.5 (-1.0, 1.6)). 11 (45.8%) patients sent sputum samples, 1 identified a clinically insignificant new microorganism. 13 (54%) patients required treatment for pulmonary exacerbations, 8 (33.3%) with intravenous, 5 (20.8%) with oral antibiotics. Conclusions Unpredicted changes to CF care delivery at our centre was not detrimental to patient outcomes. In this cohort, key CF clinical indices remained stable over a short period of shielding, supporting safe remote delivery of care. Modulator therapies likely contributed to the stability in lung function seen.

Clinical, radiological, functional and psychological characteristics of severe covid-19 pneumonia survivors: A prospective observational cohort study

Introduction The 'Long COVID' syndrome, where symptoms persist beyond the acute illness with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19), is anecdotally described. However, a comprehensive report of clinical, radiological, functional and psychological recovery from COVID-19 is currently lacking. We present a detailed radiological, patient-reported and physiological characterisation of patients attending face-to-face assessment following hospitalisation with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods Prospective single-centre observational cohort study at an inner-city South London teaching hospital. All patients admitted with severe COVID-19 pneumonia (admission duration-48 hours, oxygen requirement-40% or critical care admission) were invited to attend Post-COVID Clinic 6-8 weeks following hospital discharge. Primary outcome: Radiological resolution of COVID-19 pneumonitis. Secondary outcomes: Demographics and anthropometrics, inpatient clinical course, patient-reported and physiological outcomes at follow-up (symptoms, functional disability, mental health screening, 4-metre gait speed (4MGS), 1-minute sit-to-stand (STS) test). Results 119 consecutive patients attended clinic between 3rd June and 2nd July 2020, at median (IQR) 61 (51-67) days post discharge. Baseline characteristics are presented in table 1. Despite apparent radiographic resolution of lung infiltrates in the majority (RALE score <5 in 87% of patients), patients commonly reported persistent fatigue (78/115 (67.8%;95%CI 60.0-76.5)), sleep disturbance (65/115 (56.5;47.3-66.1)) and breathlessness (37/115 (32.2;25.2-40.0)). mMRC breathlessness score was above pre-COVID baseline in 55/115 (46.2;37.8-54.6). Burdensome cough was less common (8/115 (7.0;3.5-10.4)). 56 thoracic computed tomography scans were performed, of which 75% demonstrated COVID-related interstitial lung disease and/or airways disease. Significant depression (PHQ-9-9) or anxiety (GAD-7-9) were present in 20/111 (18.0;11.7-23.4) and 25/113 (22.1;15.0-29.8), respectively. The Trauma Screening Questionnaire was positive (-6) in 28/113 (24.8;18.1-31.9). Post-COVID functional scale was-2 in 47/115 (40.9;33.0-47.8). 4MGS was <0.8 m/s in 44/115 (38.3;29.6-46.1), 39/109 (34.5;26.5-41.6) desaturated by-4% during STS, 25/32 (78.1;62.5-93.1) who desaturated also had abnormal CT findings. Conclusions Persistent symptoms, functional limitation and adverse mental health outcomes are common 8 weeks after severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Follow-up chest radiograph is a poor marker of recovery. Physiological testing to identify oxygen desaturation is useful for triaging patients for further investigation. Face-to-face or virtual clinical assessments are recommended to facilitate early recognition and management of post-COVID sequelae in this vulnerable cohort.

P123 Remote delivery of care to people with cystic fibrosis during COVID-19 shielding is not detrimental to patient outcomes

P123 Table 1Baseline characteristics and lung function pre- and post- shielding. Data presented as mean ± SD, or median (IQR). *At start of shieldingAge, years* 28 (22, 30) Male, n (%) 10 (41.7) CFTR modulator therapy, n (%)* Ivacaftor 1 (4.2) Lumacaftor/ivacaftor 1 (4.2) Tezacaftor/ivacaftor 10 (41.7) Best measurements in last year FEV1 percent predicted,% 70.8 (23.4) Body mass index (kg/m2) 28.0 (3.6) Patients identified as ‘high risk’*, n (%) 5 (20.8) Pre- and post- shielding FEV1 percent predicted,% 67.2 (27.3) 66.9 (26.3) Weight, kg (n=21) 66.0 (15.1) 66.9 (12.9) Body mass index, kg/m2 (n=21) 23.3 (3.8) 24.0 (3.5) ConclusionsUnpredicted changes to CF care delivery at our centre was not detrimental to patient outcomes. In this cohort, key CF clinical indices remained stable over a short period of shielding, supporting safe remote delivery of care. Modulator therapies likely contributed to the stability in lung function seen.

S55 Clinical, radiological, functional and psychological characteristics of severe COVID-19 pneumonia survivors: a prospective observational cohort study

S55 Table 1Baseline characteristicsAge (years) 58.7 ± 14.4 Sex Female 45 (37.8;29.4–46.2) Male 74 (62.2;53.8–70.6) Ethnicity BAME (Yes/No) 83 (69.7;61.3–78.2) White 36 (30.3;22.6–37.8) Black 52 (43.7;36.1–51.3) Asian 18 (15.1;10.1–20.2) Mixed race 5 (4.2;1.7–6.7) Other 8 (6.7;3.4–10.9) Index of multiple deprivation score (n=115) 26.6 ± 9.7 Body Mass Index (kg/m2) (n=118) 30.0 (25.9–35.2) Charlson comorbidity index 2 (1–4) Admission PaO2:FiO2 168.8 (105.9–272.3) Critical care admission 41 (34.5;26.9–42.9) COVID-19 complications None during admission 49 (41.2;33.6–48.7) Venous thromboembolism 27 (22.7;16.8–29.4) Pulmonary embolism 23 (19.3;12.6–26.1) Deep vein thrombosis 6 (5.0;2.5–7.6) Acute kidney injury 41 (34.5;25.2–43.7) Deranged liver function 17 (14.3;9.2–20.2) Delirium 18 (15.1;10.1–20.2) Data presented as mean ± SD, median (IQR) or frequency (%;95% confidence interval). Abbreviations: BAME = Black, Asian or Minority Ethnic, PaO2:FiO2 = ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen.Results119 consecutive patients attended clinic between 3rd June and 2nd July 2020, at median (IQR) 61 (51–67) days post discharge. Baseline characteristics are presented in table 1. Despite apparent radiographic resolution of lung infiltrates in the majority (RALE score <5 in 87% of patients), patients commonly reported persistent fatigue (78/115 (67.8%;95%CI 60.0–76.5)), sleep disturbance (65/115 (56.5;47.3–66.1)) and breathlessness (37/115 (32.2;25.2–40.0)). mMRC breathlessness score was above pre-COVID baseline in 55/115 (46.2;37.8–54.6). Burdensome cough was less common (8/115 (7.0;3.5–10.4)). 56 thoracic computed tomography scans were performed, of which 75% demonstrated COVID-related interstitial lung disease and/or airways disease. Significant depression (PHQ-9 ≥9) or anxiety (GAD-7 ≥9) were present in 20/111 (18.0;11.7–23.4) and 25/113 (22.1;15.0–29.8), respectively. The Trauma Screening Questionnaire was positive (≥6) in 28/113 (24.8;18.1–31.9). Post-COVID functional scale was ≥2 in 47/115 (40.9;33.0–47.8). 4MGS was <0.8 m/s in 44/115 (38.3;29.6–46.1), 39/109 (34.5;26.5–41.6) desaturated by ≥4% during STS, 25/32 (78.1;62.5–93.1) who desaturated also had abnormal CT findings.ConclusionsPersistent symptoms, functional limitation and adverse mental health outcomes are common 8 weeks after severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Follow-up chest radiograph is a poor marker of recovery. Physiological testing to identify oxygen desaturation is useful for triaging patients for further investigation. Face-to-face or virtual clinical assessments are recommended to facilitate early recognition and management of post-COVID sequelae in this vulnerable cohort.